Very clear image, especially considering the small size of the spider (15mm). Good angle and detail. Alternative hasn't got quite as good angle but it has a chamomile flower head which shows the scale and therefore helps composition.
Support Either Self Nom. --
Fir0002 03:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Support 1. Very nice quality. I wish the background was not green but the first is still better than the second. In the second i dont like the angle as per above and the web attached to the spider's leg detracts.
Fcb981 03:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Support 1 - So, I tried nominating images with alternatives a few months ago, and was told to withdraw the nomination and nominate individual images, one at a time. Personally, I am in favor of alts because they lead to a consensus of which single image should be featured as an illustration of a topic, and therefore help reduce redundant FPCs of the same topic. What is the deal? Are they OK now?
Debivort 05:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment What about rotating the second one so the flower is upright? |
AndonicOTalk ·
Sign Here 13:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Support 1. The composition of that one makes it easier to see the entire spider as it is outstretched. In the other image, the spider's body parts are not as easy to keep apart. -
Mgm|
(talk) 09:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Support edit 1 Yes, it looks much better in the first anyways. |
AndonicOTalk ·
Sign Here 11:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Another edit conflict! Am I reminded of the Sunlight Heart in the Alternative? Anyway, I'll support the first picture; it is very good and encyclopedic, no doubt about that. The only thing I have against this picture is the fragmentation, which is very low, fortunately. Good job. --
AltirisExeunt 11:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Support first picture. I agree with everyone else. JorcogaYell! 13:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Support first Great picture of a small subject.
HighInBC(Need help?
Ask me) 00:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)reply