From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

European Wasp

European wasp on a white background. Specimen approx 12mm
Alternative

High quality macro image of a European Wasp on a white background. Taken in Swifts Creek, Victoria in January 2007

Appears in Vespidae, Yellowjacket and German wasp

  • Support Either with preference for original. Self Nom. -- Fir0002 08:53, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The alternative is more interesting, but should be cropped a bit on the right, IMO. -- jacobolus (t) 14:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support either, with slight preference for no. 1. -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 19:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support original (although, if the consensus goes against me, I'd still support the alternative). This is a beautiful shot. For once, I actually like the white background; it really sets this particular specimen off. Enuja 19:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support original. - ElbridgeGerry t c block 20:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support (pref original) — Pengo 22:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support either, I think - although (and I've been wondering about this for a couple of days now) how come the file size is so small? 160kB? Obviously not a reason to oppose in the absence of quality concerns, but a bit puzzling. -- YFB ¿ 06:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
    • Lots of white = nothing to compress. Even with min compression, JPEGs will only compress the actual colour pixels. Yo often find heavily textured/multicoloured pics don't compesss very small at all. Filesize is therefore irrelevant in FP considerations. Oh, support either image, seeing as I'm here :) fab shot - mikaul talk 12:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • That's what I'd thought it must be. Even so, I usually find Photoshop makes rather big JPEGs. Anyway, agreed that it's a good photo. On second thought, though, I prefer the original for the same reasons as HereToHelp. -- YFB ¿ 19:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Try the "Save for web..." dialog, it strips out extraneous file data. You dont get any embedded EXIF, but you do get smaller jpegs for the same quality. mikaul talk 22:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support both. And as often with Fir0002 : woa ! Blieusong 09:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support the one on the bottom. More striking, brighter colors. WaterMan90 18:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support original Shows top of abdomen more clearly, eye unobscured by antenna.-- Here T oHelp 19:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support Original per everyone. Witty lama 21:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support original despite DOF problem, this is a great image. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 18:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Support original. —dima /talk/ 16:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Promoted Image:European wasp white bg.jpg -- KFP ( talk | contribs) 09:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC) reply