Red Sea sandstorm

Reason

High quality and resolution, meets criteria
Also featured at the Turkish Wikipedia.

Articles this image appears in

Dust storm

Creator

Created by NASA, uploaded by Pixeltoo

• Support as nominator -- Ks0stm ^{( T• C• G)} 17:44, 26 December 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support I think I saw this at commons. Interesting. Noodle snacks ( talk) 10:40, 27 December 2009 (UTC) reply
  • That's probably because I nominated it both places at the same (general) time. Ks0stm ^{( T• C• G)} 18:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support Worthwhile image -- Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:24, 27 December 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support The density of images at dust storm is way too high. However, I prefer this one over most the others. Jujutacular  ^{T ·  C} 19:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC) reply
• Comment Only used in the gallery at Dust storm. Makeemlighter ( talk) 04:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC) reply
• Oppose as this is used only in a gallery. The article's imagery needs to be cut down massively- we don't need a gallery to show multiple similar images. Further, I do not think I would be comfortable supporting if it was cut down now- I would rather see it sit in the article for a little while to demonstrate that editors do not generally prefer other images. J Milburn ( talk) 13:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC) reply
  • I did such a cut down. I can't say that the images were organised in order of merit. Noodle snacks ( talk) 08:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC) reply
• Oppose per J Milburn Nelro2 ( talk) 01:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support Now that Noodle snacks has cleared out the article of its images. upstate NYer 03:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Support: GerardM ( talk) 23:28, 4 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Promoted File:Redsea sandstorm May13-2005.jpg — Maedin\ ^talk 12:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC) reply