Support. A wonderful shot, completely appropriate for this subject.
J Milburn (
talk) 21:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Weak support -- Excellent composition. A pity that image quality is not better.
Alvesgaspar (
talk) 22:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment from author -- Having just scrutinised this photo for the first time in years I understand Alvesgaspar point about quality. I just went back to the original JPG and tried to see if I could correct the faults as I saw them (noise and dust spots). The sensor dust spots were easy but not sure the selective noise reduction made for a better picture
File:Maid-of-the-Mist.jpgSaffron Blaze (
talk) 00:47, 23 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose It is a stunning photo, but the quality just isn't there. There's not nearly enough resolution on the boat, which is, really, the EV in the image.
Aaadddaaammm (
talk) 09:11, 23 May 2011 (UTC)reply
I would argue that the image shows something more important. This boat is not famous because it is a marvel of engineering, it's famous because of where it is and what it does, and this image shows that beautifully.
J Milburn (
talk) 09:28, 23 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Support - excellent. --
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 23:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Support At first I thought that the composition was not right, and didn't offer much detail on the boat. However, the mist is a significant element, having been there myself, and wouldn't be visible with a tighter crop.
JJ Harrison (
talk) 22:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Weak support This is amazing. To criticise (and I'm no photography expert) the starboard side of the ship looks overexposed (if that's the right term), there's little information left there but pure white. But the detail on the water, the disorientating mist and rainbow are beautiful.
TehGrauniad (
talk) 11:26, 27 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Promoted File:Maid of the Mist - pot-o-gold.jpg --
Makeemlighter (
talk) 01:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)reply