Photoshop distortion

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2011 at 21:37:31 (UTC)

Reason

Really good quality and looks really cool to me.

Articles in which this image appears

Photoshop

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment

Creator

Trongphu

• Support as nominator -- Trongphu ( talk) 21:37, 30 September 2011 (UTC) reply
• Oppose -- Am I missing something here? This is an image that has been randomly hit with a smattering of Photoshop filters, right? I'm failing to see the value of this image beyond some sort of cheap art and I don't see how it would enhance any article. And it seems that at least one editor over at the Photoshop article feels the same way. Also, it seems you just plugged that image into the article today. [1] If this is your first submission, don't be discouraged by my opposition. Keep trying... though maybe with another image. JBarta ( talk) 23:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC) reply

This is obviously describe how Photoshop works. That editor just try not to understand. Trongphu ( talk) 00:01, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Actually, that editor does understand. I get it. "Am I missing something" is mostly a rhetorical question. I just don't think it's a useful image for describing how Photoshop works and definitely not FP worthy. My opinion. JBarta ( talk) 00:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply

• Comment Image was removed from the article. Makeemlighter ( talk) 01:13, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
• Oppose Statutory reasons are sufficient - it hasn't been stable in the article for a week. JJ Harrison ( talk) 01:57, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
• Oppose Per all reasons stated above. JFitch (talk) 11:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC) reply
• Support It's not the kind of thing that gets nominated a lot, but it's got promise. I know my support won't make this image pass, so maybe think about a clearer way to illustrate the topic - piling 5 or 6 distortions in 1 image is probably not ideal. Aaadddaaammm ( talk) 07:15, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Agreed. A MUCH better approach would be multiple images showing effects individually. (Or in small combinations) Not something you pile all in one image like some sort of digital acid trip. JBarta ( talk) 12:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply
    • We do have as an FP. JFitch (talk) 20:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply
• Oppose -- Per above. Image no longer in the article. Alvesgaspar ( talk) 19:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC) reply
• Oppose It doesn't really show what adobe photoshop is capable of, it looks a like a mess. It really shouldn't have been nominated. Dusty777 ( talk) 16:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Not Promoted -- Makeemlighter ( talk) 19:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC) reply