Which it seems to have replaced two days ago, so I think this isn't eligible for FP? In any case, the two images show quite different views of the temple, so there should be room for both in the article.
TSP (
talk) 10:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Worth being aware that, as far as I can see, this isn't the main building (phra ubosot) of the temple - it's the later royal pantheon alongside it. (The black roof on the left of the shot is the ubosot, which houses the Emerald Buddha.)
TSP (
talk) 11:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Support – different, inside view.
Bammesk (
talk) 03:15, 19 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Support.
MER-C 18:23, 21 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Neutral. The symmetrical composition and grayed-out contrast range don't do it for me. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 19:25, 23 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Thanks, David, for your review. The sky is maybe not perfect but I think the light this morning was not too bad. Concerning the composition, it is based on the symmetrical architecture (like the
Taj Mahal for example). --
Basile Morin (
talk) 01:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment: Forgot to mention that in the introduction. Wat Phra Kaew is said to be "the most sacred temple in Thailand" (source
Wikivoyage) and "today Bangkok’s biggest tourist attraction" (source
Lonely Planet). The place is usually overcrowded, and was also that day. Several shots taken with a tripod and an ultra wide angle lens were necessary to delete some visitors, to highlight the buildings. --
Basile Morin (
talk) 01:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)reply