Support as nominator (and my God, it has been a long time coming!) Am taking suggestions for changes/ improvements, if anyone has any. – KDS4444Talk 09:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Support - Beautiful. Very useful. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 15:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Support – nice work.
Bammesk (
talk) 03:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Support –
Jobas (
talk) 17:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Support Superb, like almost all your diagrams are. Adam Cuerden(
talk) 04:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Support - Wow! Can't think of a better word. I've only dabbled in the most basic diagraming - a clade or two - but this is off the charts. Excellent contribution. Atsme📞📧 14:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Aw, shucks,
Atsme...! Thank you!! I think my
scallop diagram was technically a better drawing, but I've been working on this one for over a year now and finally decided it was time to bring it to the world. I have a revised limpet that might be done soon, and there's a scaphopod I must finish ere I leave this world (which I hope won't be for a very long time yet, but at the rate I go sometimes, you never know). So keep your eyes peeled, there will be at least two more! (eventually). KDS4444Talk 03:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The
George R. R. Martin of diagrams. All we need to do now is convert these diagrams into a hit show on incest, politics, and a little worm with a punchable face killing anyone and everyone. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 00:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
You realize this kind of flattery is going to make me spend even more of my time making even more diagrams of even more creatures...! KDS4444Talk 07:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC) reply
A better timesink than TV Tropes. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 11:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: It's an excellent diagram, but the details are rather tiny. I know it shouldn't be an issue with SVGs, but this still somewhat limits practical use; the nephridia are barely discernible at 1280px. Also, I'm wondering if it would be possible to convey the repeated segmentation without having to draw every single septum, which currently partly obscures much of the detail, covering the organs in swaths of blue overlay. --
Paul_012 (
talk) 12:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Got your comment, and I've now taken a shot at changing the image per recommendations: I adjusted the septa so that they would be more transparent generally and then less transparent toward their edges and centers with a more transparent ring running between the two (if that makes sense...?). I also tried to make the nephridia more prominent by removing some of their darker outlines, making the bladder brighter, and making the shadow behind each nephridium appear darker. One of the problems with the nephridia is that they just are very thin parts of the worms anatomy, and don't even show up well in most sections. But they are there, and are part a very important body system, so I think they must be included. Let me know if they are any more discernible now. Also note that I have included a number of small details which are just going to be missed by most casual observers (details like the tiny nephrodiopores). I drew these in because I knew they were there— think of them as Easter eggs for those who really take a thorough look at the image! KDS4444Talk 16:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply