Charles Darwin caricature

Reason

As Darwin Day approaches, Ragesoss located a high resolution version of an 1871 caricature from Vanity Fair. Is there room for two FPs on him in different styles and media? You decide. Restored version of File:VanityFair-Darwin.jpg.

Articles this image appears in

Charles_Darwin#Political_interpretations, Vanity Fair (magazine, historical)

Creator

"Coïdé", a.k.a. James Jacques Joseph Tissot (1836-1902)

• Support as nominator -- Durova ^Charge! 20:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support a greatly improved image of this cartoon, not quite as nice as the 1880 photo, but great if we can have both. . dave souza, talk 21:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support, excellent restoration. TAway ( talk) 03:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support, although I wouldn't mind a bit wider crop so the black borders of show on the left and right.-- ragesoss ( talk) 16:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply
  • A lot of pre-twentieth century borders are a hair off from true parallel and perpendicular, which looks awkward to viewers in our era. Durova ^Charge! 19:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Regretful oppose - there's a texture to this that doesn't look quite right from what I've seen of Vanity Fair. Not much that can be done about that, either. I also don't think it's as good of a caricature as Vanity Fair normally managed. Shoemaker's Holiday ( talk) 18:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support GerardM ( talk) 20:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Oppose Mediocre quality, mediocre cartoon. Interesting nonetheless. smooth0⁷0₇ ( talk) 04:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support per nom. Question: is there a limit to how many FPs can portray one subject? I'm kind of joking, but also kind of not... ~ ωαdεstεr16 _«talk ^stalk» 09:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Request This candidacy has been open since 20 January and has received plenty of responses. Requesting closure before Darwin Day? Durova ^Charge! 08:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Support-- Mbz1 ( talk) 18:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Weak oppose per Shoemaker. Spencer ^{T♦ C} 21:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC) reply
• Oppose Not the greatest quality. And not a particularly good caricature. Makeemlighter ( talk) 06:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Not promoted MER-C 02:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC) reply