Nominate and support. -
Brandспойт 21:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Support For encyclopedic value and because it is a clear diagram.
Sharkface217 01:17, 16 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Support Very enc., although would have preferred more detailed descriptions. --antilivedT |
C |
G 01:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose something about the composition and rendering bothers me. The typography is poor and hard to read at smaller sizes, and the colors are dramatic, but the lack of contrast reduces encyclopedic value. The labels and captions are not that helpful.--
Andrew c 18:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose - The image doesn't help much understanding what the AD is. It should be referred to and explained in the text of the articles it was put in, rather than being just some kind of decoration.
Alvesgaspar 20:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose The labels are far too small -
Adrian Pingstone 23:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose The image does not give much knowledge abt AD, and he labels are too brief. -
Advanced 16:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Not promoted MER-C 06:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)reply