Bengal Tiger

Reason

clear well focused and it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured.

Articles this image appears in

tiger

Creator

Indianhilbilly

• Support as nominator -- Alokprasad84 ( talk) 08:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose. Unsharp, low resolution (and only depicts part of the animal). Pstuart84 Talk 18:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Neutral- An excellent image, but the whole animal should appear, not just the upper torso. ~ Meldshal42 _{Hit me} ^{What I've Done} 19:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply

• Support-Excellent image showing facial details in closeup. Look at the clarity around eyes and mustaches. Good lighting and no special effects. -- gppande «talk» 08:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose per Pstuart84. Mfield ( talk) 15:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose regretfully. I don't know what it is about this image, it's not out of focus, but it's not quite in focus either. Wish is was, 'cause it's a great pose. Clegs ( talk) 17:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
• Weak oppose, regretfully. Good lighting, good pose, and I have gotten over my distaste for head-only animal portraits. But the focus isn't quite up to the standards of other FP animal portraits: , , , for example.
• Oppose The image is a bit thin, and after seeing this in comparison, I'm afraid I can't support. Spencer ^{T♦ C} 22:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose It meets the requirements, but the resolution is STILL an issue. I would love to see this at higher resolution. Crassic! ( talk) 22:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Not promoted MER-C 10:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply