Support as nominator --Ceranthor 00:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose I suggest keeping it as a VP. The image quality is just not good enough - it's noisy even on the preview page.
Fletcher (
talk) 02:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Speedy close It won't get promoted whatsoever. Quality just isn't there, as Ceranthor mentioned about the noise. ♣ZooFari♣ 02:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose, but not speedy. It meets the basic threshold for resolution, license, and encyclopedic value. Worth reviewing, and someone might possibly locate a better version.
DurovaCharge! 04:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose its a shame though because if it weren't so grainy it would be a really good photo --Thanks,
Hadseys 11:38, 16 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Hold on... the Redoubt picture was way grainier than this and wasn't that much compositionally better. Alas, oh well. Ceranthor 00:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose Is it just grainy in the sky, ie from dust or is it just me? Shame, it's an exciting subject.
Terri G (
talk) 16:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Not promoted MER-C 09:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)reply