Oppose Low res, jaggy, and there are already several great (and featured) images of weather systems (setting a calibur this image does not meet).
Staxringoldtalkcontribs 19:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Probably not, unless a better version of the original image is found, otherwise there's almost nothing that can be done to improve the quality. --
Pharaoh Hound 00:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Staxringold. However, would be glad to support
Oppose.-- as per reasons state above.
Geoffrey Gibson 04:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I personally don't like using GIFs for anything except animation, ergo I don't support. Plus I wouldn't exactly call it stunning or massively informative. —
Vanderdecken∴∫ξφ 15:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Support I like it, its easy to read and interpret.
TomStar81 20:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Not a very good quality and we get dozens of storms every year --
BWF89 22:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong Oppose - There have already been too many featured articles on storms. Unless they are culturally or historically significant... leave 'em off the main page. -
OldMajor 02:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment - read the article. This storm is very historically significant. It was also named the storm of the century.
íslenska hurikein #12(samtal) 14:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. I personally hate infrared satellite imagery.
Hurricanehink (
talk) 02:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)reply