Nuclear weapon
- Article is still a featured article.
Almost all of the article's content has been moved to subarticles, and what's left is not so hot. The summaries could be improved, but it's definitely no longer as good as it was when it was featured, and featured standards have improved since then - for example, its references are not specific (or, for the most part, relevant to what's currently in the article). -- Andrew 14:55, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. I think the current article is actually not that bad, but the content has changed so radically from when it was originally a FAC that the original designation is meaningless. I would almost vote to remove its status so that, after the current set of changes is done, it could re-nominated as a FAC at some point. -- Fastfission 19:25, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support removal. Agree with Fastfisson's comments. — Matt Crypto 14:13, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support removal. I also agree with Fastfisson's remarks. -- Zantastik 08:19, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. If it was truly better before, why not revert back to its best state, and then add back anything that was actually an improvement since then. This could use cleanup, not removal. - Taxman 12:49, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with Taxman. Better to do a little work on an article than to defeature it. Filiocht | Blarneyman 13:50, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as per Taxman and Filiocht. — mark ✎ 00:10, 26 May 2005 (UTC)