The article was not promoted 19:02, 9 April 2008.
We thought we'd give this a shot - after a few months of fighting through vandalism, we think this article is fairly well improved to (hopefully) FA quality. Admitted possible weakness include lack of depth in legacy, confusing sexuality question (inherent to the subject?), and possibly a need for better prose. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts! -- Midnightdreary ( talk) 01:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments