From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to contribute to clean up of their own or others' copyright violations.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

  • {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

  • Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
  • If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
  • Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place {{ subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{ subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{ subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{ subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • After examining an article:
  • replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether problem was found (add {{ y}}) or not (add {{ n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{ y}}.
  • Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)
  • If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{ collapse top}} and {{ collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Background

 Proudbolsahye

When you say "I did not know personal translations from Turkish into English are also copyright infringements for these two particular articles," do you mean that you have done other translations of (non-Wikipedia) content from Turkish to English? Calliopejen1 ( talk) 00:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC) reply

  • No just these two particular articles since I wanted it to be from the official source of both hospital websites. Proudbolsahye ( talk) 01:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC) reply
  • My Zabel Yessayan article was in 2008 and it was my first or second ever article on wikipedia. Please be so kind as to be more understanding. I replaced the article with a new Zabel Yesayan article which is not copyrighted whatsoever. Proudbolsahye ( talk) 04:32, 20 December 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Im not making excuses. If it is permitted to be open for the public on google books I would assume it is open to public on wikipedia. Proudbolsahye ( talk) 03:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC) reply
    • Your assumption is wrong. (This is, of course, an honest misunderstanding.) Just to give you an idea why, the material publicly viewable on Google Books where I live is different from the material publicly viewable on Google Books where you live. Material does not become "free" just because it appears (perhaps temporarily) on Google Books in some part of the world. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 03:36, 21 December 2012 (UTC) reply

To expand on what Demiurge says, "public domain" (what's freely copy-pastable, reusable, etc) and what's publicly available (what you can see on the internet for free) are two totally different things. Basically everything on the internet is not public domain and may not be copied freely. This looks like we may have a lot to clean up, given this misunderstanding. Proudbolsahye, would you be able to help us go through your old edits once we get a CCI set up to figure out what was copied from elsewhere? Calliopejen1 ( talk) 05:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Please note that there are some revisions with iamges that were uploaded by this user that also need to be examined. -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 01:33, 28 February 2021 (UTC) reply
Note that the user was renamed EtienneDolet-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Contribution survey

Proudbolsahye ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

This report covers contributions to 164 articles from timestamp 2006-09-07 19:55:40 UTC to timestamp 2012-12-21 08:24:17 UTC.

User was renamed "EtienneDolet" on 13 January 2014.

Articles 1 through 20

Articles 21 through 40

Articles 41 through 60

Articles 61 through 80

Articles 81 through 100

Articles 101 through 120

Articles 121 through 140

Extended content

Articles 141 through 160

Extended content

Articles 161 through 164

Extended content

This report generated by Contribution Surveyor at 2012-12-21T10:16:21+00:00 in 0.12 sec.

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/Proudbolsahye&oldid=1208330962"