The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge. Models aren't diffused by century
Mason (
talk) 23:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge, it is not meaningful to diffuse contemporary occupations by century.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 03:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:20th-century Albanian sports coaches
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge to Albanian sports coaches and 21st/20th-century Albanian sportspeople. Sports coaches aren't diffused by century, and even if they were there's not enough coaches to justify diffusion
Mason (
talk) 23:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge, it is not meaningful to diffuse contemporary occupations by century.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 03:09, 6 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Hoarders
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep as both
WP:CATDEFINING and easily sourced, so not "pretty subjective".
Hoarding disorder is a widely acknowledged condition, so why should people afflicted with it not be categorized as such? As the nominator has stated, it is not the same as OCD, so it has a separate category. (I am its creator.)
Clarityfiend (
talk) 05:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)reply
I still think that renaming makes that a bit clearer.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)reply
I'm fine with renaming if we make it clear that we're describing the disability, as opposed to how it is being described as a behavior.
Mason (
talk) 02:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Romani in the Arab world
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per nom. It might have been different if there were articles on Arab-Romani ethnic interaction in general, but that is not the case.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Mason (
talk) 23:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Identical category created by the same person. @
Johnpacklambert:, please check that a category already exists before you make it.
Mason (
talk) 19:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom, this could have been listed at
speedy.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:57, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People of Lebanese descent by occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Having only one occupation in here is not helpful for navigation.
Mason (
talk) 19:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. Or the third category may be deleted because its subcategory isn't really about descent, rather about people who emigrated.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 21:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fighting games used at the Super Battle Opera tournament
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:NONDEF failed. Where a video game was played was not and will never be defining.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 18:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom. This should have been raised at
WP:DRV, not here. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 17:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
For now, consensus is clear. Things may only change if new editors are going to participate in this discussion after they noticed the tag.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 21:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Basketball in Pune
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. The single article is already in its subcategories so no merge is needed.
User:Namiba 17:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per WP:NARROWCAT.
Sionk (
talk) 17:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete for now, without objection to recreate the category when more articles are published.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 21:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Full upmerge -- We do not need a category for this sport below Maharasthra. Even that will only have 3 articles, but that is part of an India tree.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 21:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lacrosse clubs disestablished in 1976
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Dual merge, disestablishments of notable lacrosse clubs in the 1970s is apparently very rare.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 21:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lacrosse clubs disestablished in 1982
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Dual merge, disestablishments of notable lacrosse clubs in the 1980s is apparently very rare.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 21:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: I created these categories when I thought that cashew fruit and cashew apple were interchangeable terms, but I've now learned that cashew apple always refers to the false fruit that the cashew nut grows on. I used cashew fruit because it looked like the more utilized term according to
google search trends.
BaduFerreira (
talk) 15:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per above.
Wareon (
talk) 04:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Comments on both categories are welcome, but noting that the proposed move of
Category:Cashew fruit drinks has received no discussion. As it stands, consensus seems to be in favor of deleting
Category:Cashew fruit. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlastertalk 12:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Magical girl characters in anime and manga
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fear Factor: Khatron Ke Khiladi participants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:The Challenge (TV series) contestants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Survivor (American TV series) contestants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Shouldn't it be merged rather than plainly deleted?
Marcocapelle (
talk) 21:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
As these people were already famous, not sure it is
WP:DEFINING. Happy either way though. --
woodensuperman 09:09, 6 December 2023 (UTC)reply
On the contrary I am happy with your answer. It means the answer to my question is "no, a merge is not needed" and that is perfectly fine too.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 21:25, 6 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Jewish basketball players
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: men's and women's players are divided by nationality, not ethnicity/religion.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 10:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: there is an inconsistancy in
Category:Jewish sportspeople. It makes sense where there are equal number of men and women competitors (i.e. track and field) but, IMO, it does not make sense where there are very few women and a lot more men. @
Smasongarrison, @
Marcocapelle, adding you for your opinion.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 10:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
It is a big
WP:OCEGRS mess, with categorization both by ethnicity and gender. Support nomination to begin with.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Omnis Scientia: it is not so much a matter of rules and more a matter of common sense. If I were you I would leave this nomination as is and start a fresh nomination with multiple other sports together.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 11:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose. I don't see any benefit. And I see a detriment - someone looking for the 8 women who currently fit this cat would have to scroll throw and sift a larger cat. And it is inconsistent with how we handles gender/sports cats. We have other categories split by gender. The rationale for having them there, and here, is the same. We have many categories with few women, fewer than the 8 here, and more men than women. The appeal to "common sense" rather than wp rules is interesting, but I don't see common sense supporting the nomination. And I don't see anyone suggesting we roll all of those up. See, for example, Category:Albanian women's basketball players, Albanian women's basketball players (2 P), Armenian women's basketball players (1 P), Azerbaijani women's basketball players (2 P), Beninese women's basketball players (2 P), Chilean women's basketball players (1 P), Colombian women's basketball players (2 P), Costa Rican women's basketball players (2 P), Cypriot women's basketball players (1 P), Dominican Republic women's basketball players (2 P), Fijian women's basketball players (2 P), Gabonese women's basketball players (1 P), Guyanese women's basketball players (1 P), Indonesian women's basketball players (1 P), Kyrgyzstani women's basketball players (1 P), Liberian women's basketball players (1 P), Martiniquais women's basketball players (2 P), Mexican women's basketball players (2 P), Moldovan women's basketball players (1 P), Nepalese women's basketball players (1 P), Norwegian women's basketball players (2 P), Pakistani women basketball players (1 P), Papua New Guinean women's basketball players (1 P), Paraguayan women's basketball players (1 P), Saint Vincent and the Grenadines women's basketball players (2 P), Samoan women's basketball players (1 P), Scottish women's basketball players (2 P), South Sudanese women's basketball players (1 P), Surinamese women's basketball players (1 P), Swiss women's basketball players (2 P), Syrian women's basketball players (1 P), Thai women's basketball players (1 P), Tunisian women's basketball players (2 P), Ugandan women's basketball players (2 P).
Those aren't ethnic categories so they deserve a separate discussion anyhow, with possibly a different outcome.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 10:18, 8 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Livonian people
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Overlapping categories. it is unclear to me that this distinction between these categories is meaningful
Mason (
talk) 05:57, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
That sounds like a good solution to me
Mason (
talk) 02:28, 7 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nationalists from Ponce
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge. The intersection between type of activitist and city and nationality is not defining.
Mason (
talk) 05:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Danish men by century and occupation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. this category isn't helpful for navigation with only on category in it
Mason (
talk) 03:57, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:19th-century Ethiopian courtiers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. only one person in this category which is not helpful for navigation
Mason (
talk) 03:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. Interesting biography by the way.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment When I created this category years & years ago, it was with the knowledge that there were other courtiers (a title I picked for lack of a better one) in other centuries, most prominently in the 15th, 16th & 17th centuries. Unfortunately, due to one thing or another, I have yet to create articles on said courtiers -- or to add existing articles to a related category. (
Peter Heyling, for example, should be added to
Category:Ethiopian courtiers. Another would be
Walter Plowden.) As for the outcome, I don't have a strong opinion, although if the one category becomes overpopulated, this category could doubtlessly be recreated. --
llywrch (
talk) 20:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Chinese Central Asia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Chinese in Central Asia makes absolutely no sense. Should be renamed to "History of China in Central Asia" or "Chinese expansionism into Central Asia."
SimeonManier (
talk) 01:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Commentthis earlier discussion was closed as no consensus. I think no consensus was the worst possible outcome, because at least something needs to be done here. I am open to all rename and merge suggestions, including as nominated.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:07, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:19th-century American legislators
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment As creator of the categories, I feel I should explain my rationale: these categories were created with the intention of reducing the size of the parent categories, which, in the case of
Category:19th-century American politicians, for example, contains over 13,000 names. Not all politicians are legislators. This places members of Congress, state governors, city mayors, and state or local-level cabinet secretaries all under a single banner. I do believe there is a real case for more subcategorization from the
Category:X-century American politicians categories.
For the sake of disclosure, however, these categories originated from
an RFC about creating specific categories for members of the US Congress. There was not support to create categories for each specific US Congress, in the style of
Category:UK MPs 2019–present, and so on, due to the bloat that would be created from two-year Congresses on the pages of very long-serving members. Suggestions were made to create new categories for members in each century. At the time, I concluded that the consensus was not strong enough for a very specific category set to be created, and went with the century-level legislator category instead. As I worked on the categories, however, I began to wonder if this was still too broad, with senators, representatives, state legislators, and city council members all sharing the same category. I have occasionally considered the possibility of opening a new RFC, with the specific proposal of creating
Category:X-century members of the United States Congress category sets. There seemed to be some movement toward support for this at the RFC from earlier this year, but I did not think it was strong enough at the time, and discussion eventually died down altogether.
TL;DR: I don't know the best way forward on this particular matter, and am not sure how I feel about these categories as they are. I don't agree that these categories overlap to the point that they're redundant, but I think there are some related practical problems I encountered with this specific scope.
Sunshineisles2 (
talk) 04:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
That's really helpful! Thank you for taking the time to explain it. How would you feel if it were renamed to X-century American state legislators etc? To make it a tad clearer how their distinct
Mason (
talk) 02:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)reply
I've been mulling around a similar idea in my head, which would be to create subcategories of legislators, like 19th-century members of the United States Congress or 19th-century American state legislators, and the legislator category becoming a container category or eventually being deleted entirely.
Sunshineisles2 (
talk) 04:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Wouldn't this necessitate keeping the categories under discussion as containers?
BD2412T 16:10, 7 December 2023 (UTC)reply
I guess it would, though it's still a tentative idea, so I hadn't really thought out out all the considerations involved.
Sunshineisles2 (
talk) 16:27, 7 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Sunshineisles2, especially the 19th-century target is too large to be useful.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose Not all politicians are legislators. Some held only a different type of office. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 07:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.