Category:List of video games that include the use of a grapple hook
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete Even a bigger problem is that this is a category, not a category of lists. It might (but probably would not) work as an actual list, but fails as a category. They probably didn't try a list because there is a total lack of reliable sourcing that discusses these as a group.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 02:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. Renaming the other category is a subject for a future discussion.
MER-C 16:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment. Since Japan is more likely to use US English spelling, perhaps a name change of the merge target to
Category:Jewelry companies of Japan is worth considering?
Grutness...wha? 14:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)reply
We've managed to confine the American spelling to the American category. Cant we keep it like that?
Rathfelder (
talk) 21:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Jewellery retailers of Turkey
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Container Crane manufacturers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Few companies specialise in
container cranes. If not merged as proposed should be renamed to correct the capitalisation. DexDor(talk) 18:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Support. Not enough articles to subdivide.
Rathfelder (
talk) 20:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mayors of Killeen, Texas
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Also merge to Mayors of places in Texas
Category with just 1 entry.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 16:01, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
dual merge as nom: the usual outcome in such cases.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 18:26, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Upmerge with no prejudice against recreation if we get enough contents. With over 100,000 people this might happen.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 02:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Belarusian music chart "LF Top Songs"
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:speedily deleted already under
WP:G5. –
FayenaticLondon 13:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Promotional category obviously created by a sockpuppet of banned user
Alex9777777. They have previously created essentially the same page, most recently (that I know of) as Category:Music "LF Top Songs ♪", but also in several other versions as well.
PohranicniStraze (
talk) 16:00, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The world is equal for everyone, the category has the right to exist !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Music proekt (
talk •
contribs) 16:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Please respect the work of other people and do not delete the category!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Music proekt (
talk •
contribs) 16:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete -- I think we have regularly deleted record chart categories.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete as non-defining especially for articles (e.g.
365 (song)) that don't mention Belarus. DexDor(talk) 19:45, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Television stations in Ponce, Puerto Rico
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge to parents.
MER-C 16:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Upmerge It appears in Caribou the "mayor" is actually the head of the council with additional honorific duties. The term is 1 year at a time. 2 of these people were state senators (one succeeded the other) and the third is notable as a prominent person in state-wide civic action, not really for her short time as mayor. Just to make things more fun that 3rd person was the wife of another one of the mayors we have an article on. With this merger we will have 15 articles in the people from Caribou, Maine category. There is no good reason to split in any way a people from category that is that small.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Architectural styles
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:split/merge.
MER-C 16:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: the proposed outcome will result in the latter two categories having clearer names that are reciprocal, and are consistent with other Wikipedia categories analysed by two criteria. The first one
Category:Architectural styles will hold articles on styles and sundry sub-categories, and a new
Category:Architecture by style to hold the main sub-categories by style such as
Category:Art Deco architecture. –
FayenaticLondon 15:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose the first 2 - I would agree that something needs to be done but the first 2 appear to be subcat schemes for
Category:Architectural styles (which contains some subcats of the form 'Fooian architectural styles').
Oculi (
talk) 12:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Support, the second rename is simply a matter of improved grammar, the first rename splits the category in two clearly distinct categories (one consisting of styles, the other by style). The third rename could be a bit more debatable because many subcats contain "period" instead of "style". However the current name of the nominated category does not contain "period" either, so the proposal is an improvement anyway.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Tentative and provisional Support, but who is going to do the considerable amount of work needed to split
Category:Architectural styles properly. All too often sweeping movements are approved here without considering this, resulting in a worse mess than in the first place.
Johnbod (
talk) 17:28, 18 September 2019 (UTC)reply
I'm willing to implement my nomination. –
FayenaticLondon 11:15, 21 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary intermediate category. Only one sub category
Rathfelder (
talk) 12:16, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Merge, agreed. I can't find any scope to expand this. –
FayenaticLondon 08:40, 16 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Climate change science
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge.
MER-C 16:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Climatology defined as Climate science. Looked at articles to see if Climate change science was more economics side of climate change science but found no hint of that (except perhaps sub category
Category:Climate change conferences which may need moving to be a sub category of something more like
Category:Climate_change_policy or
Category:Climate_change_policy. Anyway categories are too similar, and I think they should be merged.
crandles (
talk) 16:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Support per nom, climate change is a theme in climatology. But as for implementation, the articles should be dispersed between
Category:Climate change and
Category:Climatology, since not all articles about science.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:07, 31 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Will try to do that appropriately.
crandles (
talk) 11:02, 31 August 2019 (UTC)reply
While this is being discussed, Climate change science is a sub category of Climate which is a sub category of Climatology. Should Climatology be a sub category of Climate rather than other way around? I wouldn't know how to make such a change, nor would I be sure of appropriate reasons to make/change it one way or the other.
crandles (
talk) 11:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Agree that climatology should be a subcategory of climate. Climatology is (just) the study of climate, while climate is the broader topic.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 11:33, 31 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Not sure I do not oppose a merge but I also would not oppose the recreation of this category if anyone developed it better. Currently "climate change science" is a smaller category containing more technical articles and "climatology" is the larger category which seems to contain some but not all of the science, and also many political, data, or list-oriented articles.
Category:Climate change skepticism and denial is not a subtopic of either of these, and instead is a subtopic with these under
Category:Climate change. Probably there are enough articles in the top level "climate change" to justify having a discussion to plan the structure of all subtopics, and not just considering this one category independently. Still, if there is only interest in looking at this one category now, then it could be merged, but I would not want a present merge to be a barrier to any future dividing into subcategories by replicating this category or introducing any new scheme.
Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MER-C 10:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
I have the impression that the concerns of
User:Bluerasberry can simply be solved by critically reviewing the current content of
Category:Climatology. These concerns are unrelated to the proposed merger however.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle: You are correct, that does seem like a more focused alternative to this category.
Merge per nom. Climate science does not really study static climate, all they study pretty much has to do with climate history, which is all about climate change.
Place Clichy (
talk) 07:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Convoys (Transformers)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 16:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Overly specific in-universe category more in-line with Wikia's needs. All articles are categorized elsewhere.
TTN (
talk) 15:49, 30 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MER-C 10:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Support per
WP:SMALLCAT. There is no need for upmerging to the parent category since all articles are already in a sibling category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Spy Changers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge.
MER-C 09:32, 11 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Overly specific category. All articles are already present in other series-related categories.
TTN (
talk) 14:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MER-C 10:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose plain deletion per Fayenatic london, neutral towards upmerging.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Upmerge While the status quo is almost as good as upmerging I believe displaying them all on one page would make navigation slightly easier. --
Trialpears (
talk) 21:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Scientists of medieval Islam
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Clearer, better match to article space (
medieval Islam redirects to
Islamic Golden Age), better match to parent category
Category:Islamic Golden Age (it has no "medieval Islam" parent categories). Note: if this is renamed a further CFD could propose renaming the subcategories. DexDor(talk) 18:44, 31 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MER-C 10:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose We rather over-use the concept of the Islamic Golden Age, which doesn't have a very clearly-defined date range, making it unsuitable here. We should stick with the
Science in the medieval Islamic world form.
Johnbod (
talk) 17:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)reply
That would be ok with me. DexDor(talk) 05:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Rename to
Category:Medieval Muslim scientists. For the other alternatives real problems have been raised leading me to believe this is the best proposed option. To aid in seeing if there's consensus for this proposal I'm pinging
Johnpacklambert and
Johnbod. --
Trialpears (
talk) 23:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedia Hebrew templates
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename/merge.
MER-C 13:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: The current names are inconsistent, poorly phrased, and/or misleading (the pages in the Devangari category are templates, not
help pages). The Wikipedia {Foo} script templates naming convention is advantageous in that it clearly identifies each category as containing project maintenance templates related to a particular writing system. (Note: I am not including the subcategories, which also need to be renamed, until the broader question of naming conventions is decided. Pining the category creators,
User:Gilgamesh~enwiki and
User:Mahitgar.) --
Black Falcon(
talk) 21:16, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MER-C 10:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Rename the Hebrew category as nominated. Upmerge the Devanagari category to
Category:Wikipedia multilingual support as it only contains one template (there was previously also an old user draft for the same template, which I have now blanked). –
FayenaticLondon 18:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
That works, too – I am fine with upmerging the Devanagari category. Thanks, --
Black Falcon(
talk) 04:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nansen Refugee Award winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete per
WP:OCAWARD and
WP:NONDEF, and there is already a list included in the main article.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:51, 4 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MER-C 10:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete -- Not yet another AWARD category. I get fed up with deleting them: lists do the job much better and prevent category clutter.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.