The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 17:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete - Category that should be a list. Also just silly. MakeRocketGoNow 00:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 17:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete. All contained articles have since been renamed and re-categorized. This category is empty. — Markles 23:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 17:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Only contains subcategories for the three Iowa universities and no articles; there's not much of a reason for this category to exist, as all content is already tagged within Category:Universities and colleges in Iowa. – Swid ( talk | edits) 20:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 17:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 17:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Contains articles with "Holy Cross" in the name. This is not a useful categorization. Conscious 18:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Cat redir. Vegaswikian 17:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Monasteries is a better cat and effectively duplicates this cat. Necrothesp 17:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Conscious 05:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The categories are really the same with Category:Best lists being the more concise name, which in addition matches the name of the opposing category Category:Worst lists JeffW 17:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep. Conscious 06:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Limited meaning within French context. Intangible 17:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment As an analogy and example, you can look at the ubiquitous meanings of New Right. Intangible 22:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete Category:Wildlife of Antarctica and Category:Antarctic animals and merge Category:Fauna of Antarctica to Category:Wildlife of Antarctica. Vegaswikian 18:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Conscious 05:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC) reply
"Filipino" is for people, while "Philippine" is for other things. -- Howard the Duck | talk, 14:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus. Vegaswikian 19:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
"Filipino" is for people, while "Philippine" is for other things. -- Howard the Duck | talk, 14:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus. Vegaswikian 19:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
"Filipino" is for people, while "Philippine" is for other things. -- Howard the Duck | talk, 14:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge category, listify description. Conscious 05:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC) reply
*Oppose.
Roman Empire ≠
Holy Roman Empire. -
choster 15:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 18:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
the category name does not follow the WP:TV-NC concerning the use of 'TV', nor the ones on the usage of capitals in articles names. The parent is Automobiles, not Car, so this seems more appropriate to me. Also "automotive" is defined as "of, relating to, or concerned with motor vehicles", which leaves the potential for other types of motor vehicles besides cars, which is a broader category, which concerning the amount of TV shows in this area seems appropriate to me The DJ 13:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 18:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Post World War II what? Hopefully the proposed new name will be found clearer, and it matches category:Aftermath of war. Bhoeble 13:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 19:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Reason: Violates POV by endorsing a subjective view, which could never have unbiased criteria as to what a dictator is. -- Yossarian 12:24, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Let's go take away any instances in the article on the Civil War (America's, that is) that says that the North won. How do you define "win"? Does every historian agree on your definition of "win"? SushiGeek 20:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 18:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Reason: most of the other categories use "Haiti", which is standard in English usage. Hawkestone 12:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Merge. Vegaswikian 19:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
pointlessly tiny: There have been only two so far (and may be a third one in the summer). Umbrella CDP, wherein they are duplicated anyway, will do better; after all, it is also rather sparse and there will hardly ever be much about this subject on enwiki. Anyway, it should have been "chairmen". Malyctenar 11:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep. Vegaswikian 19:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
A stupid category, probably aimed to promote firearms proliferation limiting. Millions of people are killed by firearms, dozens of thousands of them are subject to WP. Unlike Deaths by pokemon attack that would be interesting. By the way, a typo (by firearms). Delete category. Ukrained 10:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus 6 support, 4 opposed. Vegaswikian 19:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
This will bring this category's title inline with other film category titles. Lady Aleena 10:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 17:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
I'm just completing an incomplete deletion listing. The comment added was (which I assume would be his rational for deletion) is "if this had been a worthy category, it would have been made a long time ago." I would add that Category:Capricorns and Category:Virgos could be considered for similar reasons. Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC). reply
Don't Delete It Just because you think that your smarter and have more knowledge then us, dosen't mean you have to delete everyones idea. What, do I have to earn points to make new things and categories? Come on man. Don't delete it. - 22 May 2006/3:19 P.M. - A Different World
Don't Please don't delete it. This is new. It's not old. It's new. No one on this earth has ever thought about this. Why delete it? Other peoples profiles are not encyclopedic. You guys are mean. Don't delete anything. Don't. Please. - 23 May 2006/5:18 P.M. - A Different World
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 17:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Ideally a category has to be useful navigational aid and a useful categorization (!) aid. At least one of these. And it should't require the fine print, that a list can provide. Unfortunately, this category is essentially There is some X which says "Y is cult". IMHO this is completely absurd approach to categorization. Also, as secondary issue, this offers just too little cohesion. I can't see, that the Spartacists League and the Moonies have to be in one category. And why isn't the Wikipedia included? Considered to be a "techno-cult of ignorance" by those charming Aetherometrists. -- Pjacobi 00:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC) reply