The result of the debate was Already renamed. Vegaswikian 19:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Per case below (with New Zealand) and naming standards for such - Category:Flora by country NTDOY Fanboy 04:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was relist Tim! 10:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Needs deletion, or renaming (to what?) for following reasons:
Feel free to suggest new name considering all above-written. Ukrained 22:45, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 06:31, 11 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Not very useful. Broad scope. -- Longhair 22:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge. Vegaswikian 23:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
This will ensure consistency with Category:Flora by country. Alan Liefting 21:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep. Vegaswikian 00:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Tiny redundant catergory, already covered by Category:Transport_in_Dundee
The result of the debate was Rename to based in Foo. Vegaswikian 00:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC) reply
While the following are all sub-cats of Category:Organizations by country, they all also have a by nationality naming convention. I find this inconsistent and am proposing that they be renamed to a by country naming convention. If voting against this proposal, please consider commenting in favour of a move to Category:Organizations by nationality. By nationality namings are ambiguous, such as the scope of Category:English organisations. Almost all organization sub-cats such as companies, trade unions, and others, use a by country convention.
In regard to "in country" or "of country", both options have merits and drawbacks. Sub-categories of Category:Organizations such as Category:Companies by country and Category:Trade unions by country currently use "of country", but "of country" can be misleading in regard to if the organization is an organ of the state, for example Category:Organizations of the People's Republic of China. "In country" does not have that confusion with the state, though it may also be slightly ambiguous as multinational organizations may operate within more than one, or in fact within several states. "Organizations headquartered in Foo" or "Organizations based in Foo" are also offered for consideration.
Lastly, in regard to usage, "in country" appears to be used vastly more in practice for at least some states. Google searches (minus the term "wikipedia") found these results:
The following categories are proposed for renaming:
-- Kurieeto 19:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Note: Changed "in" to "based in" in list for renaming on June 5. Kurieeto 12:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 23:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Proposed for renaming to match the current naming convention of all other sub-cats of Category:Women by nationality, such as Category:Welsh women and Category:Spanish women. Kurieeto 18:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep. Vegaswikian 23:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
These categories are very nebulous. It is not clear what years each category spans--specifically, the end year. It is also not clear if this category is intended for all events following each war or only for those events that were somehow related to the war. If it's the former, then the category is simply a rehash of everything in Category:1919, Category:1920, etc. If it's the latter, then how do you demonstrate that the event was related? Does it have to be directly related or indirectly related? Appleseed ( Talk) 15:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete - EurekaLott 03:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Three day old duplicate of established category:Transport in Pakistan. It was populated, which was an improper unilateral renaming, so I have reversed it. If someone wants a rename, the onus should be on him or her to obtain consensus here in advance. Honbicot 14:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Merge and Redirect. Vegaswikian 23:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 23:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Taizhou is a city in China with a population of 5.4 million. The category names needs at least one more capital letter. "Based in" is used for U.S. states and is better for subnational company categories because it discourages overcategorisation to places where a company happens to have a branch. The city's article is at Taizhou, Zhejiang for disambiguation purposes. Nathcer 14:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 23:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Adaptations is proper usage of English, not adaptions Gurubrahma 12:21, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus to merge Tim! 09:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The "year of birth unknown" category is the best way to deal with this, though some of these articles should actually be in Category:Year of birth missing, as someone knows the year, but it hasn't been added yet. This category, "year of birth unknown", should be for people with genuinely unknown or uncertain birth years. See also the discussion here. Carcharoth 11:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 23:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Most categories starting "Wikipedia:" have been renamed recently. I'm proposing to do it with the rest:
Conscious 09:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Keep Category:Helstar Albums, delete others. Vegaswikian 06:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete: Contain articles of a non-notable group which is on AFD itself, all have one or none article. May the Force be with you! Shr e shth91 ($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 09:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename to Category:People of Åland. Vegaswikian 23:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename to Category:People of Åland or Category:Ålandic people, as using names as adjectives peculiar to U.S.
The result of the debate was rename Tim! 09:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC) reply
and
To follow other "[Country adjective] + [occuptation]" categories ( Category:Liberian people, Category:Brazilian politicians, etc) if "Ålandic" is the/an accepted adjectival for Åland. (I believe it to be so, but am not sure.) Otherwise suggest rename to "[Occupation]s of Åland". David Kernow 08:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was relist Tim! 09:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC) reply
An editor appears to have created new categories for most - if not all - Legend of Zelda categories by including the word "The" at the start. As I can't find any reference to a previous discussion here, I assume these changes haven't been ratified at Cfd. Can editors please state whether they wish to Keep the new category names (including the word "The") or Revert to the old ones (without "The"). Thank you. Road Wizard 06:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 06:41, 11 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Pop music individuals who are worshipped? I think? — tregoweth ( talk) 06:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 00:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Apparently for news media's impact on popular culture, but that is so nebulous and subjective that a category seems unworkable. — tregoweth ( talk) 05:59, 3 June 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 06:44, 11 June 2006 (UTC) reply
This category contained solely erotica-related websites, implying that "adult" is synonymous with "pornographic" - not very accurate, and somewhat POV. Someone created a category called "Erotica websites," to which I moved all of the articles listed under the old category. ~ Booya Bazooka 05:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was never tagged and in any case no consensus Tim! 09:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Apparently for TV shows that have had some sort of pop-culture impact, but that is so nebulous and subjective that a category seems unworkable. — tregoweth ( talk) 05:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Rename. Vegaswikian 23:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
To bring this category's name inline with other film categories. This is similar to
this rename.
—
Lady Aleena
talk/
contribs 05:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC).
reply
Can this be speedied please?
—
Lady Aleena
talk/
contribs 21:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
reply
Rename all to be consistent with other cat pages under Category:People by nationality (note naming of Category:Trinidad and Tobago people, Category:New Zealand people, Category:Cook Islands people) and per arguments in next nomination down Mayumashu 05:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep. Vegaswikian 23:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
rename all. the proposed naming style is closer to the conventional people by nationality naming convention of 'Fooian people'. (nouns commonly act as adjectives where an adjective form is not commonly used, as in Category:New Zealand people and not Category:New Zealander people. the potential adjective phrase "Bosnian and Herzegovinan", although consisting of two properly formed adjectives, seems incorrect) (will tag sub-cats later) Mayumashu 04:43, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 06:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC) reply
delete both empty and named unconventionally (for actors per nationality cat page) Mayumashu 04:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Lists of people by proposed medical condition Tim! 08:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Move to correct grammar. Q0 04:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was relisted Tim! 08:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete. Ambiguous categorization. Intangible 03:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete Discussion about hold has been quiet for a week. Vegaswikian 06:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC) reply
DELETE - I don't see a need for this. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomical objects#galaxies by orientation for further discussions 132.205.45.148 03:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was reverse merge Tim! 20:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge: All of the articles were moved to the new category because they are more than just lists. The old category is now empty. — Markles 00:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC) reply