The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 08:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete; rename will probably go through, but to what is unknown; recommend renominate as rename -- Kbdank71 20:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
A recently created series of categories all redundant with Category:People by ethnic or national origin and subcats. Delete-- Peta 00:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Keep and redo nomination as mergers or keep as subset of ethnicity origins pages Mayumashu 06:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete; rename to Category:Plants and pollinators -- Kbdank71 20:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 20:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
-- musicpvm 21:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 20:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
As per medicine, "Medicine is the branch of health science and the sector of public life concerned with maintaining or restoring human health through the study, diagnosis and treatment of disease and injury." I argue that aging by itself is neither a disease nor an injury, and is a normal, healthy biological process. "Anti-Aging medicine" is therefore not a neutral term, as medicine is for the treatment of injury or disease as above, and aging is neither. I am proposing a renaming of this category to " Category:Anti-aging" to institute a neutral point of view. Kurieeto 19:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was DELETE -- Drini 22:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 20:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename, This category was recently renamed [1] after a very short discussion. It was originally nominated 'to avoid confusion with the President of India', which is a very unlikely event. The term 'Congress President' has an eighty-year history, during which practically none of the incumbents have been known as anything else; and, indeed, the replacement title is misleading as the Congress President is not infact the President of the INC but the President of its central committee, the All India Congress Committee. This needs to be changed back as soon as possible. Hornplease 18:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Drini 22:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename. The main article uses the term "transport association", and some of the names of the associations do not include the word "Verkehrsverbund". Merchbow 16:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 20:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename. I was going to put this up for speedy because of the incorrect capitalisation, but there is a cat redirect at what seemed to me a more appropriate name. I perceive ambiguity in the purpose of the category as currently named. British Colonies redirects to Evolution of the British Empire. If no support for renaming as proposed, at least rename it to Category:British Colonial flag images. RobertG ♬ talk 16:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Drini 22:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename, simply expanding the abbreviation (I didn't know what CPLP stands for). Note to closing admin: if the rename goes ahead please remember to point the existing redirect at Category:Portuguese speaking countries to the new category name. RobertG ♬ talk 16:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename to "People in health professions". -- Drini 22:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The inclusion of the word "the" in the current title has connotations to me that there is a list or limits towards what "the" health professions are. This category needs flexibility in the types of health-related occupations people can have to be included in it, so I'd like the word "the" removed.
Kurieeto 16:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Drini 18:53, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
It was agreed some time ago that all the transport categories for European countries should use "transport" in line with usage by the EU and European governments. The main category for Spain is
Category:Transport in Spain and we have
Category:Transport in Madrid,
category:Transport in Catalonia and
Category:Transport in Barcelona, but there are some recently created regional categories which do not follow this precedent. Several of these categories are non-compliant with basic category naming practices, including the intermediate parent category,
Category:Transport of Spain by autonomous community (which does use "transport") and are therefore also in need of renaming for other reasons.
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge. Redundant category. All articles can be safely grouped into one of them. Andrés C. 15:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Drini 18:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename, in line with the main article Ajax (programming). As you can see from Ajax, there are one or two other possible meanings. Note to closing admin: if the rename goes ahead, please remember to change the cat redirect Category:AJAX (corresponding to the article AJAX redirect) to point to the new name. RobertG ♬ talk 15:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was relisted here because Category:Turkish Americans wasn't tagged for deletion -- Kbdank71 19:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was duplicate nomination. See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 July 21 - EurekaLott 18:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename, I think the category should be renamed because the new name is shorter and more precise.
Crashintome4196 15:00, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Drini 18:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Improperly named. Diseases are not capitalised on Wikipedia. Please rename. JFW | T@lk 13:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep as metacat -- Drini 18:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 18:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 18:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete cat and subcats per verifiability issues -- Drini 18:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was renamed -- Drini 18:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename, and leave a {{ category redirect}}, to bring in line with the previous consensus to rename US demonym categories. This is the only one left, and must have been missed. RobertG ♬ talk 09:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:12, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge, This category requires two subjective judgements of editors: firstly, that the subject is politically a conservative and, secondly, that they are an activist. Some subjects have been active in the Conservative Party and can go straight into Category:UK Conservative Party politicians, and at least one was a parliamentarian. Some are of dubious notability. All in all I think this adds a confusing layer to Category:British politicians. Mtiedemann 08:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 16:57, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 18:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 16:52, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Drini 18:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
transfer from PROD as PROD does not and should not handle categories – 132.205.44.134 01:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Drini 18:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
transfer from PROD as PROD does not and should not handle categories – 132.205.44.134 01:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply