- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:01, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Too wee, too poor, too stupid
- Too wee, too poor, too stupid ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet the requirements for notability, seems to be campaign slogan, no other supporting links to suggest that this phrase is meaningful beyond a few newpaper articles using the term Solntsa90 ( talk) 23:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 June 12. — cyberbot I NotifyOnline 00:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Philg88 ♦ talk 08:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 12:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- How notable is this meme? Can we get some Scots Wikipedians in the debate? Bearian ( talk) 22:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable topic Just because Alex Salmond and a few bloggers have used the term doesn't make for an article. See Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Philg88 ♦ talk 22:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.