The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Mediati74, copyright violation isn't usually a reason to completely delete a page from Wikipedia. Please could you provide some evidence for your allegation, and also explain in more detail, with reference to
Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musicians, why you think this demonstrates that the page should be deleted?
~dom Kaos~ (
talk) 20:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep The nom needs to elaborate and point out what is a copyvio, but the subject is an obvious charting singer, no doubt. Nate•(
chatter) 21:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep Per
speedy keep criteria #1 and #3. Is a charting singer, clearly establishing notability, and Earwigs suggests the only reason for copyvio is some quoting from the interview. No valid rationale for deletion is advanced. Best,
Eddie891TalkWork 01:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep "Violation possible" according to Earwig's Copyvio Detector,
here relates to two quotes from a Triple J article. The source is properly acknowledged in this article by use of a suitable reference template. There is no copyvio here.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk) 03:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.