The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
✗plicit 23:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Non-notable person, doesn't meet WP:GNG. I don't think there are guidelines for clergy, but I can't make WP:SCHOLAR fit -- no publications, no national or notable appointments, no significant contributions to the art.
Mikeblas (
talk) 23:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Why does that position convey notability? Are references available for it, anyway? The reference in this article is to Facebook, and I don't have an account. The reference in
Archdeacon of Bristol is to an archived copy of a local newspaper's website, which incidentally mentions him during coverage of a jubilee celebration in the town. Searching the
Disocese website for "McClure" gets no hits at all. --
Mikeblas (
talk) 16:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment -- Lately we seem to have had doubts as to whether archdeacons are notable per se. This is the only basis on which I can see that he would be notable.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 15:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)reply
keep Since he has an entry in UK Who's Who
Piecesofuk (
talk) 15:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per Piecesofuk.
StAnselm (
talk) 21:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep though it would be nice to see the article improved.
Doczilla@SUPERHEROLOGIST 20:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.