The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not clear how this might meet notability guidelines. Acting as temporary HQ for an WWII American General seems more like trivia than a claim of notability.
RadioFan (
talk) 00:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. Major five-star hotel in an historic building on a major street in a major city. I think we can give it the benefit of the doubt. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. There's sufficient sources to establish this as a legitimate modern landmark in Rome. --
Arxiloxos (
talk) 17:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I agree with the above. It has multiple sourced claims to fame/notability. It's not the most famous hotel ever, but it has location, as mentioned, in its favor, as well. I think it just makes it past the notability threshold.
Scarlettail (
talk) 01:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - It's long and varied history, as multiple sources spanning decades indicate, do give indication of notability. --
Oakshade (
talk) 05:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - number of sources indicate sufficient notability.--
Staberinde (
talk) 16:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.