The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unsourced since December 2009, no significant coverage to be found online when searching web, news or books. Doesn't meet
WP:GNG or
WP:NGEO.
AlexandraAVX (
talk) 09:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Local or county roads are not automatically notable, and this is lacking
significant coverage. 16:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bearian (
talk •
contribs)
Comment. Note that this is not a county road in the US sense. County roads in Sweden are still national highways. And this is a
primary county road. It could therefore be considered to meet
WP:GEOROAD. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 10:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
typically notable isn't the same as being notable, being a primary county road makes it more likely to be notable but there doesn't seem to be any SIGCOV of this that I can find.
AlexandraAVX (
talk) 10:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 14:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment - even the Swedish entry has no sources. Mr.choppers | ✎ 12:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Brief mentions in documents by the municipality and
Vägverket, but there is no in-depth coverage even in these documents, and no independent coverage.
Draken Bowser (
talk) 21:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.