The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Missvain (
talk) 00:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Fails GNG, WP:NPOL. "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability" He was, briefly, the CARETAKER governor of a province? Other than this scant - and insufficient - claim, no notability whatsoever.
Alexandermcnabb (
talk) 06:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep - Curious to hear others views on this, In a Google news and general Google check I could see several sources such as
1,
2,
3,
4,
5 and
6. I'm still learning on Wikipedia so any more experienced editors viewpoints would be helpful. --
Pulisi (
talk) 07:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Also,
Mir Afzal was made in 2013 and is even more bare in terms of both article length and refs so if
Sher Jehan Mir gets deleted I'd give that a look. --
Pulisi (
talk) 07:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, per
WP:POLITICIAN: Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels. He served as the chief minister of a Pakistani province; even if we go by the argument that he was a caretaker, it's important to note that the
constitution provides for a caretaker officeholder. Mar4d (
talk) 07:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Chief Minister (whether caretaker or not) of a province in Pakistan is notable; passes
WP:POLITICIAN.--
Goldsztajn (
talk) 11:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per Mar4d and Ngrewal1.VRtalk 04:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. A person who had only been a "caretaker" provincial governor for one or two days might potentially fall below the bar, but a person who held that role for more than six months was clearly more than a historical footnote, because he very clearly held the role for a significant and meaningful amount of time. Yes, the article needs some improvement, so by all means tag it for {{refimprove}}, but the role clearly satisfies
WP:NPOL.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.