From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Orrin Hatch#Lobbying ties as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 13:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Scott Hatch

Scott Hatch (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, I think. WP:NOTINHERITED. Literally. jps ( talk) 13:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. jps ( talk) 13:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • I was surprised to find not much about him online, except for routine business stuff. I don't think the not-inherited argument holds water in his case. It's not that we're claiming notability based on having a notable father, we're claiming notability based on the fact that he's a lobbyist with a massive conflict of interest (because his father is a politician). Most of the articles I found that address this are actually more about his father than about him, so my inclination would be to redirect to Orrin Hatch#Lobbying ties, which is all about exactly this subject, and better referenced. Elemimele ( talk) 13:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: LA Times is fine, but that seems to be all there is. There's an NPR article about a biologist with the same name, I assume it's a different person. I don't see notability with the sources we have. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Washington, D.C.. Skynxnex ( talk) 16:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Redirect to Orrin Hatch#Lobbying ties per Elemimele, as he already referenced there. Per nom. and Oaktree b, it fails WP:GNG. Sal2100 ( talk) 22:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 02:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nomination, not notable based on the available sources. SportingFlyer T· C 17:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nomination or redirect per Sal2100 good suggestion. 2A01:799:2E3:C500:556:815E:86C2:7DB1 ( talk) 15:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Orrin Hatch#Lobbying ties: notability is not WP:INHERITed though sourcing is not bad. She was a fairy 03:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.