The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not notable - no external sources included to show notability
TheIslander 01:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete per lack of notability.
Corpx 06:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete A quick
google search shows up no
reliable third-party hits for this club. Moreover, it is not
notable and the information in this article is difficult to
verify as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 07:07, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete does not feature in local news sources. —
BillCtalk 12:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete - existence is not enough. There is nothing here to indicate that this club has won anything notable and no reliable secondary sources to meet
WP:N.
TerriersFan 00:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable not verifiable
Balloonman 04:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete per nomination does not meet
WP:N nor does it supply reliable secondary sources.
Yamaguchi先生 01:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.