The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Primal sympathy

Primal sympathy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced opinion piece of Ode: Intimations of Immortality. This does not meet WP:GNG and is a violation of WP:OR. At most this may warrant a mention in the Ode: Intimations of Immortality article if it can be properly referenced and supported. McMatter ^{( talk)}/_{( contrib)} 14:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^{( talk)}/_{( contrib)} 14:07, 3 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^{( talk)}/_{( contrib)} 14:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete as unsourced WP:OR (pure essay). If there had been any citations there might have been the possibility of merging with Ode: Intimations of Immortality, but as it stands there's nothing to merge. Suggest straightforward delete, with no objections to anyone working on the Ode article if they have sources. The Ode article in fact mentions and cites sympathy already. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 15:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete An original essay without a source in sight. -- Mr. Magoo ( talk) 21:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete - this is an essay, not an article. I'm not sure that it could be redirected anywhere, but ping me if you can think of something. Bearian ( talk) 18:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete as not currently convincing for keeping as its actual own article. SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.