- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 16:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Plurals Party
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Plurals Party ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability, seems paid work. Sturdyankit (chat) 09:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.
Spiderone 10:09, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Which notability criteria are you referring to? §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 10:55, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NORG would apply for a political party or organisation, which it does seem to fail. Most of the references are about the founder and there's no in-depth coverage of the party. Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
-
Delete as per nom. In the latest election, the party got less votes than
NOTA. No significant in depth coverage in the media either. --
Manasbose (
talk |
edits) 07:42, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
- DELETE: per nom. Faizal batliwala ( talk) 11:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
- DELETE: per nom. Edito_Freak ( talk) The party and the party chief were mostly engaged in social media campaigns (paid likes and engagements). The article was naively written and was edited by me many times – removed materials without proper reference. I think the page should be deleted because the party failed to make an impression. Votes were lesser than NOTA on most of the seats. 16:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.