The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 14:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Agree it's redundant with the species articles. If there is any intersection discussion between the two in terms of characteristics, that can be handled in the respective species articles like we do for other species that share a name or similarity.
KoA (
talk) 21:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Adding onto KoA's point, the respective Giant panda and Red panda articles already emphasize these species' distinct evolutionary history with
Red panda#Phylogeny providing multiple phylogenetic trees to explain this point.
BluePenguin18 🐧 (
💬 ) 07:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.