The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 18:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Ned Polsky

Ned Polsky (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Both offline and online source searches turn up little significant coverage to confer notability per ANYBIO. Apparent failure of WP:NAUTHOR and WP:BLP1E as the only claim to notability is signing a letter. SITH (talk) 00:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 00:52, 16 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 00:52, 16 February 2019 (UTC) reply

• Ned Polsky's book "Hustlers, Beats, and Others," first published in 1967, seemed to be widely read in the San Francisco Bay area during and after the Height-Ashbury movement, almost as a companion book to Theodore Roszak's "The Making of a Counter Culture." However Polsky did not generate much news, and his influence was not as great or as lasting as Roszak's. I guess not enough is known about him to make a good bio article. Too bad. I think he was an interesting person. His obituary is at [1] - HowardMorland ( talk) 03:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC) reply

• @ HowardMorland: - there may in fact be sources to support an article. If you are willing to put the effort into a source and expand. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 14:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC) reply

• KEEP Looks like a familiar thing: old article that needs an upgrade. this prof (of sociology or criminology) had a real footprint back in the day. In his case, the 60s. quite a lot of stuff turned up in a quick proquest newspaper archive search of the title of his book and his surname. I added 2 book reviews, and am out of time. But I do think it will be a keep. A willing editor without access to news archives might try searching for significant coverage in books. Also, do we have a list of pool-related deletions? Returned, ran the title of his book thorugh JSTOR search , added half a dozen academic journal book reviews. Sails past WP:AUTHOR. Page is still paltry, but I suggest that we keep it instead a redirect to his notable book. Reason is: he must have been born somewhere, gotten his PhD somewhere, been on the faculty somewhere and perhaps bred up a generation of young criminologists. He may well have written other notable stuff. So, just KEEP and hope an editor comes along to improve it. WP:HEYMANN] sourcing with book reviews. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 15:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC) reply
• Weak keep. I'd be more comfortable with the case for WP:AUTHOR if there were more than one book. But the book does appear to be quite significant and I think there's enough other stories surrounding the subject (who appears to have been quite a colorful character) to save it from WP:BIO1E. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:41, 23 February 2019 (UTC) reply

• Keep An interesting thing about WP:AUTHOR#3 is that it does not specify "book". Polsky is an easy pass of WP:AUTHOR#3 because he created two works (Hustlers and the Mailer essay) that were separately significant, well-known, and discussed in multiple periodicals. The rest of the coverage he received is bonus. Bakazaka ( talk) 21:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.