- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Merge / redirect to be discussed on article TalkPage. ( non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Mimi Soltysik presidential campaign, 2016
- Mimi Soltysik presidential campaign, 2016 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page is not notable enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghoul flesh ( talk • contribs) 02:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 26. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 02:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep (creator). There is no rationale for deleting the article. Moreover, the campaign has been covered in multiple, independent news outlets, including major newspapers and mainstream television. Obviously passes WP:GNG-- TM 14:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Mimi Soltysik#2016 presidential campaign. I agree that it passes WP:GNG, marginally at least, but there simply isn't enough content at this point to merit a standalone article. The article currently of about half a dozen sentences and 3 very short paragraphs, and virtually duplicates the content of the section I propose redirecting to. No prejudice against re-creation if more more substantive information should follow, but until then this is mere redundancy.-- Ddcm8991 ( talk) 16:54, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect per Dcm8991 and no prejudice against recreation if more content is developed. I concur that the topic meets GNG. Royal broil 00:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- When I have the time, I am going to dig deeper into the content and expand the article. Since there seems to be a consensus that it meets GNG, we should just place an expand tag on it, not merge/rediӖrect.-- TM 11:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect - not needed until there is more content. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Merge per Ddcm8991. Splitting the information about Soltysik's campaign from his main article doesn't provide significant benefit to readers. Neither of the articles is long. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Merge to the article about the subject, to Mimi Soltysik § 2016 presidential campaign. This will improve the merge target article. North America 1000 16:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.11.195.40 ( talk) 23:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.