From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. In addition, I urge Suicasmo to read WP:NPA closely. Randykitty ( talk) 17:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Mie Television

Mie Television (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sourcing includes zero in-depth coverage. Was redirected to JAITS, but that was challenged, while more sources were added, they were simply more of the same db entries and brief mentions. Would have draftified, but with the creating editor's attitude, did not see much point. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. Current sources are enough to support the article. More than 3 independent sources (Bloomberg, Chiba TV, MIC, JBA), and covered the contents mentioned in the article. Onel5969 can't provide any evidence to support that current sources are not in-depth coverage. Onel5969 often deleted or merged articles that were sufficiently sourced and without any discussion. This behavior is not constructive, and very harmful for the collaborative culture of Wikipedia.-- Suicasmo ( talk) 14:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Being the only commercial television station in a prefecture is sufficiently important for the article to remain. Bensci54 ( talk) 17:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Television station, which means tens of thousands or more are going to see it. The article has 3 other pages linked, so clearly it's notable. An un-notable TV station is a non-existent TV station, but even channels that have closed still have pages here. KatoKungLee ( talk) 03:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.