- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 15:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Mehdi nadjafikhah
- Mehdi nadjafikhah ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability issues about the articles namesake, doesn't appear to meet speedy criteria and is referenced so cant PROD Amortias ( T)( C) 11:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Weak delete. GS h-index of 6 [1] does not really make WP:Prof#C1. Too early. Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC).
- Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. His citation counts in Google scholar are well below the top citations for the same subject ( Burgers' equation) and there seems to be nothing else. — David Eppstein ( talk) 02:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.