The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 18:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - found some local historic references, but not enough to meet GNG
—МандичкаYO 😜 05:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete per
WP:G12 as the article is completely a copy of webpage found here
[1]. --Non-Dropframetalk 07:27, 14 May 2015 (UTC)reply
@
Non-dropframe: That article is a copy of the Wikipedia article. A big clue is the bottom part that says "Source is from Wikipedia".
—МандичкаYO 😜 07:38, 14 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
DeleteA minor official, neither notoble in their own right or ex officio.
TheLongTone (
talk) 13:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.