The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
BD2412T 23:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)reply
There is no indication of notability. The sources cited, absurdly unreliable, only mention her in passing. There is no mention of any "controversy". Her husband is a private citizen who happens to be a third cousin of the head of a deposed dynasty, so I imagine nobody even cared. But most importantly, the subject herself is a private individual and reliable sources seem to have no interest in her.
Surtsicna (
talk) 17:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Totally not notable. The dude she married isn't even notable enough for an article. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 06:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete if she married into a roayl family that had any real power, than maybe she would be notable. They don't have any power, so there is no notability here.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 13:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete for the reasons given by the editors above.
Smeat75 (
talk) 13:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete No substantial, in-depth coverage of the subject. Borderline tabloid journalism.
Glendoremus (
talk) 03:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.