The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 19:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
We're not going to genderize drumming. List is redundant to List of drummers. Drmies ( talk) 04:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC) reply
*Delete. Drmies nomination statement sums this up nicely - there is no need for this list.
— sparklism
hey! 11:49, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Warden makes a persuasive argument: changing to keep.
— sparklism
hey! 08:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
reply
My main problem here, besides the ghettoizing by gender (and you can look that up), is that no argument is given in the article for its existence. And look at Drummer--if you want us to refrain from "contemptuous action", maybe you should re-write that article, bringing up the issues and their sources. Without any actual text on gender and drumming, this is just a lot of hot air and helps advance no one's cause. (And I note that none of the proponents of keeping this list have been bothered to turn their activist interest into verified text.) Drmies ( talk) 23:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC) reply