From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of unsuccessful terrorist plots in the United States post-9/11. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 21:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC) reply

June 2015 New York City pressure cooker bomb plot

June 2015 New York City pressure cooker bomb plot (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Nothing about this article indicates it is any different from the foiled terrorist plots mentioned in the List of unsuccessful terrorist plots in the United States post-9/11 article. An attack hasn't even been attempted in this case. If deleted, any relevant information from this article can be moved to that one, because it does need mentioning there. Love of Corey ( talk) 21:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply
No, they are not. Merging this with that article sounds a lot like WP:SYNTH. Love of Corey ( talk) 09:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply
For some reason I do not see it included to the List of unsuccessful terrorist plots in the United States post-9/11. I do agree that not all terrorist plots are notable. However, those linked to famous international organizations (like ISIS or Al Qaeda) and covered in multiple RS I think are all notable enough to deserve a separate page. My very best wishes ( talk) 17:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Hence why I said anything relevant can be merged to that article. And this article doesn't have a lot of RS to support notability, nor does it involve any direct link to famous international terrorist organizations like you say. This is just an act of support, nothing more. Love of Corey ( talk) 19:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply
I simply think such cases are not "routine" crime cases, very far from it. They need to be included somewhere, on separate pages or/and in a list. In this case I would say in the both to provide some details. My very best wishes ( talk) 20:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Yes, and that's why I think the List of unsuccessful terrorist plots in the United States post-9/11 article covers it perfectly. Love of Corey ( talk) 21:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.