The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep sloppy nomination. There were already two "external references" and I easily added a third. Please read
WP:BEFORE. --
Dweller (
talk) Become
old fashioned! 12:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak keep. Most of the hits are churnalism or in deprecated sources, but I did manage to find
[1] and
[2]. I tried to cut most of the outrageous promo from the article just now but there is probably some left.
AleatoryPonderings (
talk) 00:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.