From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 19:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply

James More

James More (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with no external references. Rathfelder ( talk) 22:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder ( talk) 22:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep sloppy nomination. There were already two "external references" and I easily added a third. Please read WP:BEFORE. -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 12:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep. Most of the hits are churnalism or in deprecated sources, but I did manage to find [1] and [2]. I tried to cut most of the outrageous promo from the article just now but there is probably some left. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 00:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.