The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Promotional and non-notable. Theusual cute story of how it got started is normal promotional fare. The references are either about other products primarily or are incidental mentions or name-dropping (The NYT Magazine one, for example, is a very short fashion paragraph mainly about another company). DGG (
talk ) 00:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep – The company meets
WP:CORPDEPTH. Only the Partnerships section in the article has a promotional tone, which is minor, and can be corrected by simple
copy editing. Also keep per
WP:NEXIST, because
notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. Source examples include, but are not limited to those listed below. North America1000 01:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - Notable jewelry company, with national level references, a clean-up would be welcome of course. Jeremy112233(Lettuce-
jibber-jabber?) 15:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.