The result was keep. WP:SNOW Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 06:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC) reply
No evidence provided for the notability of this Royal Navy ship, which was one of seven ships of the same name. The disambiguation page, HMS Constance, provides more information than the article. TFD ( talk) 17:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
This ship fails the test. As a small ship that was in service for a short period during which the Royal Navy was not engaged in war, it is unlikely to have drawn any attention. Here is a link to a picture of another corvette commissioned at the same time and now in a museum. TFD ( talk) 00:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC) replyAs for any subject on Wikipedia, presumption of notability for a military unit or formation depends wholly on the existence of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The consensus within the Military history WikiProject is that the following types of units and formations are likely, but not certain, to have such coverage and therefore likely, but not certain, to be suitable for inclusion: 4.Warships, including submarines, commissioned in recognised naval forces. Examples include HMAS Sydney, USS Enterprise and SMS Blücher....