Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guide to: Health & Jealousy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. If someone wants to be bold and redirect them all as well, that's fine. Wizardman 04:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide episodes[edit]

Contested prods, without explanations. All these pages are articles from episodes of the Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide series, these articles are merely plots of these episodes and don't explain why these episodes are outstanding episodes, and notable. They therefore don't meet WP:EPISODE. Many of the other episodes of this series are already deleted. -- lucasbfr ^talk 19:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, these are basically unsourced plot synopses and trivia pages. They do not meet WP:EPISODE. --Core desat 20:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per WP:NOT#PLOT. None of them meet WP:EPISODE. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 20:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deleta all per nom.--Max Talk (+) 21:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 22:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, these are generally plot summaries without analysis or criticism. We don't do straight plot summaries here. Squidfryerchef 22:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All Hooray! Not that I don't like Ned, but I'm glad to see someone take the lead in nominating articles about TV episodes for deletion. If I want to read about an episode of Ned, I'll read it in volume "N" of the World Book Mandsford 22:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I havent seen the show, but it sounds like a very interesting concept, even if it sounds a bit preachy (i.e. don't listen to rumors, etc. ). I wish the effort that went into writing up these plot summaries could be used to write a good, solid main article on the series, which undoubtedly has been discussed in magzaines and newspapers that can be cited. Squidfryerchef 22:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the LOE - and I can bet with certainty this AFD will devolve into silliness. Will ^(talk) 23:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT#PLOT. Nenyedi • ^{(Deeds•Talk)} 23:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and add commentary Its a lot easier to find commentary than to delete and have to recreate a summary. There should be a tag created to announce its missing "critical commentary". --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 00:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per Ten Pound Hammer. Dbromage [Talk] 00:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect No particular need for them to be deleted, they can be merged and redirect to the LOE page. i ^said 03:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all in failing WP:EPISODE per lacking coverage from reliable sources Corpx 04:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete i don';t think we'll find commentary for these. I can't see anyone else caring that much about the plots. Of course, I might be wrong, so let's see if Richard can find some. DGG (talk) 08:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all to List of Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide episodes. That way, if notability-establishing sources and commentary are forthcoming later, the summaries won't be completely lost. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 00:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per Josiah Rowe and per WP:EPISODE which actually says to merge and redirect, not delete. DHowell 22:21, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all and expand the list to include brief episode summaries. --thedemonhog talk • edits 02:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to a "list of episodes" page. --Fabrictramp 13:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Josiah and WP:EPISODE. Neranei (talk) 15:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as per nom Harlowraman 21:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - as failing WP:V due to lack of supporting sources. Further there are no 'real-world influences' nor any sourced critical commentary. TerriersFan 21:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.