From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:17, 29 June 2014 (UTC) reply

GetWellNetwork

GetWellNetwork (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline-to-non-notable company, most citations I could find were to primary sources, article appears to have primarily been written by the company itself. (If the decision is 'keep', it should at very least be stubbed so someone can rewrite it not as an ad.) rahaeli ( talk) 12:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:36, 5 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 01:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Leaning to keep. Looked at a number of sources, but most were healthcare or IT industry publications that might be considered more advertorial than independent journalism. Left me with impression that is a large corporation that might be notable but could use more independent, reliable sources. Canuckle ( talk) 05:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 04:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.