The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Trainsandotherthings, please execute rename as soon as possible. Thanks!
Daniel (
talk) 07:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment. Possible sources include Trains magazine and Don Hofsummer's history of the Southern Pacific Railroad. I'll check.
Niles Subdivision would be the natural merge target but it's a red link.
Mackensen(talk) 12:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Three passing references in Trains. They do substantiate the source of the name.
Mackensen(talk) 14:58, 5 June 2023 (UTC)reply
I strongly suspect this is not the most common name of the yard (not the first time
this has happened). This is quite a significant facility and UP has a major intermodal operation here, as it's adjacent to the
Port of Oakland. I'm still trying to figure out the name but I would be very surprised if this doesn't meet GNG.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 22:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep, but rename It's exactly as I suspected - names used appear to include Oakland Yard(s), West Oakland Yard(s), or Oakland Pier Yard(s). I've also seen
Oakland Terminal. I ran into similar issues while bringing
Cedar Hill Yard to FA status - names used include Cedar Hill Yards, Cedar Hill Yard, Cedar Hill Terminal, and Montowese Yard. For the facility in question, I was able to find ample significant coverage:
[2] "Above all, the Southern Pacific dominated West Oakland's industrial, as well as social, geography with its massive switching and maintenance yards, roundhouses, car assembly and repair shops, creosoting plant, and shipyards (the Southern Pacific built ferries for San Francisco Bay)."
From this sampling I think it's pretty clear we are dealing with a major rail yard clearly surpassing GNG, it's just at the wrong title.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 22:39, 5 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.