The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. There is consensus here to delete. (It would also qualify for speedy deletion under criterion G5, as the article was created by a block-evading editor, with no contributions from anyone else except correcting a couple of links and nominating for deletion.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "
JamesBWatson" (
talk) 11:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Was deprodded with the following rationale: " Inidividual is independently covered, 2nd place for Francis Pomeroy Naismith award passes WP:NCOLLATH". However, that is not what
WP:NCOLLATH says, it clearly says "Have won a national award" (my emphasis). Other than that, this is borderline, but not, imo, notable.
Onel5969TT me 13:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. It is rare to find a sportsperson that fails our super-inclusive notability criteria for that profession, but as the nom notes, this one does fail it. So - delete. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 13:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Covered in multiple sources including Passes
WP:NCOLLATH via being second place for a major award NCAA Award the
Francis Pomeroy Naismith and Gained national media attention as an individual, not just as a player for a notable team. Covered in the
Washington Post[1] Times Ledger
[2] and the
NY Times[3]. Easily passes GNG
BlackAmerican (
talk) 02:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The
WP:GNG argument isn't addressed in the existing comments supporting deletion.
T. Canens (
talk) 17:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
T. Canens (
talk) 17:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Does not pass GNG. Agree with nominator, it is borderline but does not check through.
TheGracefulSlick (
talk) 03:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.