From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 19:01, 14 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Claire Kittrell

Claire Kittrell (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable subject with a few references to unreliable youtube and twitter. Also refs to few other unreliable websites. Notability is not inherited. Article refers to comments made on a twitter account that may or may not be written by article subject. Ar best the twitter comment is self published, at the worst it is considered unreliable because it is not known for certain who posted the comment on unreliable twitter, whether it be the subject or another party. Article and subject fails WP:GNG and has not proven N notability. Article was tagged for notability, but another editor objected and quickly removed the tag citing some alphabet tag. I have heard that failing argument before, thus bringing to AFD to attempt to gain a consensus decision from any group of editors. Antonioatrylia ( talk) 18:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete none of the sources provide the indepth coverage needed for notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:25, 29 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete – I can find plenty of passing mentions, as well as gossip magazines commenting on her being transgender, but not enough coverage in reliable sources to keep the article. Fails WP:BASIC. Quasar G t - c 12:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - everybody's got a YouTube channel, nothing notable here. Montanabw (talk) 10:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.