- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:19, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Captive Digital Reach
- Captive Digital Reach ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a digital advertising model. I am unable to find a single source to even establish that such a thing exists, let alone is notable. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 15:24, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG, seems a bit obvious (sums to "put ads on popular pages") Origamite \(·_·\) (/·_·)/ 16:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - With absolutely no sources apparently available it could probably be speedied as made up. --— Rhododendrites talk | 16:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - blatant advertising. Nickmalik ( talk) 03:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, as per nom - I searched and failed to find any mention of it anywhere, even a trivial mention on a non-reliable source. Agyle ( talk) 07:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.