- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:11, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Camlann Medieval Village
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Camlann Medieval Village ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:AUD, the local coverage this attraction has received is not sufficient to achieve WP:NBUSINESS BrigadierG ( talk) 11:46, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries, Organizations, United States of America, and Washington. BrigadierG ( talk) 11:46, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I was doing a reference search and have been called away. For now, I've left some links at Talk:Camlann Medieval Village.
- -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 15:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 13:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per BrigadierG's source analysis at Talk:Camlann Medieval Village.
- -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 22:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep as nominator following doing some source analysis I see GNG is met. BrigadierG ( talk) 22:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.