- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Bert Wollersheim
- Bert Wollersheim ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per our WP:BLP policies, I'm not convinced that the sourcing is adequate for such a negative article. Ϣere SpielChequers 19:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The current BLP has some extraordinarily iffy sourcing including sources which rank somewhat lower than the Daily Mail in veracity, and some sources which do not make the claims they are supposed to support. The person has no notability in any English language sourcing, and not a lot in the German tabloids either. http://www.bild.de/regional/ruhrgebiet/sophia-wollersheim/berti-schaute-finale-im-tabledance-laden-44378242.bild.html is the latest "BILD" article - if this is a "notable person" per Wikipedia standards, then please tell us <g>. Collect ( talk) 19:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as the article is questionable at best. SwisterTwister talk 05:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete insufficiently sourced to pass GNG. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.